Tested

WRAF

A tea-community app concept, from brief to moderated usability test.

My role Team of 4. My recorded shares: 25% of each fidelity level and 50% of the Phase 4 presentation; 100% of the Phase 5 test-report introduction, 50% of 'Presenting and Analyzing Results', 40% of document adjustment; 50% of 'Stakeholder' in Assignment 1.

Year
[CONTENT REQUIRED]
  • year
Shown only in review mode.
Context
[CONTENT REQUIRED]
  • context
Shown only in review mode.
Status
Tested
Team size
[CONTENT REQUIRED]
  • teamSize
Shown only in review mode.
Problem

What needed solving.

The brief cites research reporting that tea-sector platforms present unstructured and scattered information, and adds the user's side: many varieties and brewing techniques can overwhelm, and a new platform can itself be a barrier.

Screen by screen

What the user sees.

  1. Recipe · Iced Butterfly Pea Flower Tea Latte
    01

    Recipe · Iced Butterfly Pea Flower Tea Latte

  2. Tea store · All types
    02

    Tea store · All types

  3. Product · Blackcurrant Infusion
    03

    Product · Blackcurrant Infusion

  4. Recipes · Grid
    04

    Recipes · Grid

Approach

How I approached it.

Four destinations around a home hub — Recipes, Community, Store, Personal account — with three ways in. The team mapped persuasive techniques to 12 screens (social proof, scarcity, personalisation, incentive, control), fixed a green palette with named type tokens, then built prototypes at three fidelity levels.

Evidence

What the test said.

7
Moderated participants, in-person, in their own environments
4 / 7
Participant records noted a navigation problem
2 / 7
Found the community '+' add-post icon unclear
5 / 7
Search-task records noted no issue
[object Object]
Participant P2 (navigation task)
[object Object]
A footer navigation bar fixed on every page; a clearer add-post icon; cart price beside the quantity. The documents do not record whether any were made.
Takeaway

What this one leaves behind.

Four course deliverables, one test, zero post-test screens. The report's own 83.3% success figure does not reconcile with any whole-number share of 7 participants, so this page uses the recorded times, clicks and comments instead.

Reflection

What I took from it.

[CONTENT REQUIRED]
  • reflection
Shown only in review mode.

A short reflection from Wejdan — to be written.

A team project; individual contributions as noted above.